Kelly

Kelly v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 4th 910·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1151·2006 Daily Journal DAR 9809·46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 335·71 Cal. Comp. Cases 934
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 26, 2006B176552California6,335 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perluss, J.

Recognizing a local government employer might dismiss an employee after determining the employee is incapacitated and unable to perform his or her job duties or those of an alternative position only to have the county retirement board subsequently conclude the employee is not entitled to a disability retirement, the Legislature in 1970 amended the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (Gov. Code, § 31450 et seq.) to add language designed to protect the affected employee. In addition to confirming the role of the county retirement board as the final arbiter of permanent incapacity for the performance of job duties, section 31725 provides, when a county employee is dismissed from his or her employment for permanent disability and the employee’s application to the local retirement board for a service-connected disability retirement is thereafter denied on the ground he or she is not permanently disabled, the employer must, following the finality of the retirement board’s decision, reinstate the employee retroactive to the date of dismissal and provide backpay and other benefits that would have otherwise accrued during the dismissal period.

In Stephens v. County of Tulare…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.