In Re Frank S.

People v. Frank S.

Bad Law
141 Cal. App. 4th 1192·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1187·2006 Daily Journal DAR 10036·46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 839·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7036
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 1, 2006F049045California2,448 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vartabedian, J.

The juvenile division of the superior court found true against appellant Frank S., a minor, one count of carrying a concealed dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, § 12020, subd. (a)(4)) with a gang enhancement (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)), one count of possession of methamphetamine (Health and Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), and one count of false representation to a peace officer (§ 148.9, subd. (a)). The minor appeals, claiming sufficient evidence does not exist to support the court’s finding true the special allegation that appellant possessed the dirk or dagger for the benefit of his gang with the specific intent to promote, further, or assist criminal gang behavior. We agree and reverse the special allegation. We publish this case to emphasize that crimes may not be found to be gang-related based solely upon a perpetrator’s criminal history and gang affiliations.

FACTS

On July 17, 2005, a Visalia police officer initiated a traffic stop of the minor after he failed to stop at a red traffic light while riding a bicycle. The minor rode alone and gave a false name to the officer. The officer discovered the minor in possession of a concealed five-and-one-half-inch fixed blade knife,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.