Vance

People v. Vance

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 4th 1104·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1181·2006 Daily Journal DAR 9993·46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 585·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6983
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2006C049453California3,661 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cantil-Sakauye, J.

In 1984, 23-year-old defendant James Michael Vance attacked his mother with a meat cutter saying, “Your [sic] a clone, you’re not my mother.” Defendant had been in treatment for mental illness off and on since he was 17. Pursuant to a stipulation of the parties, defendant pled not guilty by reason of insanity to the charge of attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§187 & 664). The court ordered defendant confined in a state hospital for the mentally disordered for a maximum term of nine years pursuant to section 1026.

On October 4, 2004, the People filed their most recent section 1026.5 petition to extend the maximum time of defendant’s commitment. Defendant requested a jury trial. The jury found defendant was “a person who by reason of a mental disease, defect or disorder represented] a substantial danger of physical harm to others . . . .” On March 2, 2005, the court ordered defendant’s commitment extended by two years pursuant to section 1026.5, subdivision (b)(8).

On appeal, defendant contends he is entitled to reversal and remand for a new trial because: (1) the court unlawfully denied defense counsel’s request that defendant’s shackles be removed at trial; and (2)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.