In Re EH

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 4th 1330·46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 787
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 6, 2006E039350California1,588 words

Opinion

Opinion

Janette Freeman Cochran, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Pasadena, for Minor.

McKINSTER, J.

Mischelle A., defendant and appellant (hereafter mother), appeals from the trial court's order under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 selecting guardianship as the permanent plan for her 14-year-old daughter, E.H. The only issue in this appeal is whether the evidence supports the trial court's finding that the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) ( 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) does not apply. We conclude the evidence is sufficient to support the finding and therefore will affirm.

Resolution of the issue mother raises in this appeal does not require a detailed recitation either of the facts or of the procedural history of this case. Those details are set out in mother's opening brief. For our purposes it is sufficient to note that mother has seven children by four different fathers and has been involved intermittently in the dependency process since 1991 due to numerous ongoing issues, including a history of substance abuse. This appeal is from a dependency proceeding initiated in January 2003, with respect to the six of mother's children who at that time were minors. In a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.