Celis

People v. Celis

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 4th 466·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1084·2006 Daily Journal DAR 9362·46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 139·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6481
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2006B182346California4,287 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Isabel Celis appeals from the judgment entered following her conviction by a jury of the first degree murder of Norma Barto. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189.) The jury found two allegations to be not true; a lying-in-wait special-circumstances allegation (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(15)) and an allegation that appellant had personally used a deadly or dangerous weapon. (§ 12022, subd. (b).) She was sentenced to prison for 25 years to life.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury sua sponte on when a murder is complete, on the defense of mistake of fact, and on proximate cause. Appellant also contends that the trial court erroneously excluded evidence that would have supported the credibility of a defense witness. We affirm.

Facts

The body of Norma Barto was discovered at a dump site on December 2, 2003. Barto had severe head injuries. A 65-pound concrete block with blood on it was found about a foot away from her head.

Dr. Fred Walker performed an autopsy. He found 19 scalp lacerations. Most of the lacerations were consistent with blows from “a rod-like structure,” a thin pipe, or a tire iron. He opined that certain injuries to Barto’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.