Achene

Achene v. Pierce Joint Unified School District

Good Law
176 Cal. App. 4th 757·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1336·97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 899·29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1017
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 13, 2009C057888California5,385 words

Opinion

Opinion

Blease, J.

This appeal concerns the right of a probationary teacher, charged with unsatisfactory performance during the school year, to a written notice of her deficiencies and an opportunity to correct them prior to a notice of dismissal.

On December 8, 2006, Sarah Achene, a first-year probationary teacher, was notified by defendant Pierce Joint Unified School District that she was to be dismissed for unsatisfactory performance, effective January 10, 2007, pursuant to section 44948.3 of the Education Code.

Although she was informed prior to the notice of dismissal that her performance could be “refine[d],” she was not told that it was unsatisfactory or that a failure to improve her performance warranted dismissal. Achene appealed the notice of dismissal to the district’s governing board which affirmed it. She sought relief in the trial court by writ of administrative mandamus. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.)

The trial court found the district failed to comply with the procedures set forth in sections 44948.3, 44664, and 44938, and concluded that the board’s order dismissing Achene was null and void. It directed the district to restore Achene’s lost wages and benefits from January…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.