Williams v. Southern California Gas Co.

Good Law
176 Cal. App. 4th 591·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1313·98 Cal. Rptr. 3d 258
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 13, 2009B210897California5,023 words

Opinion

Opinion

Flier, J.

Appellants Lee Williams, Sherrie Powdrill and Lee Williams as guardian ad litem for minors Kalonni and Montice Williams filed an action for personal injuries against respondent Southern California Gas Company and other entities who are not parties to this appeal. The action arose from the malfunctioning of a natural gas wall furnace in a home rented by appellants. Respondent’s demurrer to the second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend because the trial court concluded that discovery responses provided by appellants in a prior action were in conflict with the allegations of the complaint in this case.

We do not agree with the trial court’s ruling. We find, however, that respondent did not owe appellants a duty of due care. We therefore affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

In substance, respondent’s demurrer was sustained because in a prior action, which was also predicated on the malfunctioning of the wall furnace, appellants provided discovery responses, which were inconsistent with the claim advanced in this action, that respondent’s negligence was the cause of appellants’ injuries. As an example, an interrogatory in the prior action asked appellants to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.