Superior Dispatch, Inc. v. Insurance Corp. of New York

Good Law
176 Cal. App. 4th 12·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1265·97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 533
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2009B204878California7,882 words

Opinion

Opinion

Superior Dispatch, Inc. (Superior), appeals a summary judgment in favor of its insurer, Insurance Corporation of New York (Inscorp). The trial court granted summary judgment based on a one-year contractual limitations provision in the policy and concluded that Inscorp's failure to notify Superior of the provision did not support an equitable estoppel to assert the provision. Superior's principal contention on appeal is that Inscorp had a duty to notify Superior of the contractual limitations provision under a Department of Insurance regulation (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 10, § 2695.4, subd. (a)), [1] and that Inscorp is equitably estopped from asserting the limitations period because it failed to provide the required notice. Superior also challenges the sustaining of a demurrer to its fraud count and the striking of its punitive damages allegations.

We conclude that section 2695.4, subdivision (a) requires an insurer to notify its insured claimant of contractual limitations provisions and other policy provisions that may apply to the claim, regardless of whether the insured is represented by counsel. An insurer's failure to notify its insured of a contractual limitations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.