Wood

Wood v. Santa Monica Escrow Co.

Good Law
176 Cal. App. 4th 802·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1332·97 Cal. Rptr. 3d 909
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 13, 2009B205939California1,705 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

A party who prevails on appeal is not necessarily the prevailing party in an action.

Defendant prevailed in the underlying lawsuit when plaintiff dismissed with prejudice. Defendant moved for attorney fees pursuant to a fee provision in the contract between the parties. The trial court denied the motion and defendant appealed. We affirmed.

Plaintiff now seeks attorney fees because he prevailed on defendant’s appeal of the denial of its motion for fees. We agree with the trial court that plaintiff is not entitled to fees. Defendant is the prevailing party in the lawsuit considered as a whole.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Craig Wood is the personal representative of the Estate of Merle A. Peterson and trustee of the Peterson Family Trust. Wood filed a complaint alleging that Patrick McComb and Eddie Jamison participated in a scheme to deprive the elderly Peterson of her property by inducing her to obtain a loan secured by her residence. Peterson obtained a loan for $250,000, the proceeds of which were distributed to McComb. Santa Monica Escrow Company (Santa Monica) acted as escrow for the loan.

The complaint alleged three causes of action against Santa Monica:…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.