Watson

Watson v. Superior Court

Good Law
176 Cal. App. 4th 1407·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1404·98 Cal. Rptr. 3d 715
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 25, 2009C059957California6,065 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hull, J.

The Medical Board of California (Board) has authority to discipline a licensed physician for unprofessional conduct. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 2227; further undesignated section references are to the Business and Professions Code.) Section 2239, subdivision (a) identifies as a form of unprofessional conduct the use of alcoholic beverages “to the extent, or in such a manner as to be dangerous or injurious to the licensee, or to any other person or to the public, or to the extent that such use impairs the ability of the licensee to practice medicine safely . . . .” (Italics added.) In this original mandamus proceeding, petitioner contends the italicized “or" in the foregoing statutory definition of unprofessional conduct must be read as “and” in order for section 2239 to pass constitutional muster. In other words, petitioner argues, the use of alcoholic beverages to the extent or in such a manner as to pose a danger to the physician or others may be the basis for professional discipline only if it is also proven there is a nexus between such use and the physician’s ability to practice medicine safely.

We reject petitioner’s attempt to rewrite section 2239. Although we agree…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.