County of Sacramento v. Superior Court

Good Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 3d 449·180 Cal. App. 4th 943·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 2089
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 29, 2009C062025California4,214 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

In this mandamus proceeding, we are called on to determine whether a request for a hearing in an action alleging noncompliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) must be made in a writing filed with the court to avoid dismissal under section 21167.4, subdivision (a) for failure to “request a hearing” within 90 days of the filing of the petition. Construing section 21167.4 as a whole, as we must, we conclude the answer to that question is “yes.”

Because petitioner here failed to file a written hearing request within the time allowed, its CEQA claims must be dismissed. Accordingly, we will order that a writ of mandate issue directing the trial court to vacate its denial of the motion to dismiss at issue here and enter a new order granting that motion.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On June 12, 2008, Forster-Gill, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandate and complaint for quiet title and other relief in the Sacramento County Superior Court relating to the County of Sacramento’s approval of a project known as “The Landing” and the final environmental impact report for the project. The first cause of action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.