Jacoby

Washington Mutual Bank v. Jacoby

Good Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 3d 245·180 Cal. App. 4th 639·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 2053
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 2009B212347California3,146 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bigelow, J.

Scott Jacoby appeals from an entry of summary judgment against him. In an interpleader action initiated by Washington Mutual Bank (Washington Mutual), defendants Jacoby and State Farm General Insurance Company (State Farm) both claim an entitlement to excess funds Washington Mutual received in satisfaction of a promissory note secured by a deed of trust it held. Both defendants filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court denied Jacoby’s motion and granted summary judgment to State Farm. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The facts are undisputed. Rubin Charles Pittman owned a home in Harbor City (the property). The property was encumbered by a first deed of trust in favor of Home Savings of America F.A., which was the predecessor in interest of Washington Mutual. Pittman insured the property against loss by fire with State Farm. The insurance policy included a lender’s loss payable endorsement.

In October 1995, a $98,784.42 judgment was entered against Pittman in an unrelated action. In February 2005, the Los Angeles County Sheriff recorded a $207,014.49 “Notice of Levy (Enforcement of Judgment) Writ of Execution” against the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.