Turner

Turner v. Vista Pointe Ridge Homeowners Assn.

Good Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 3d 750·180 Cal. App. 4th 676·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 2046
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2009G040480California4,128 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moore, J.

Vista Pointe Ridge Homeowners Association (Association) brought a successful Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 motion to strike the complaint of Jeffrey M. Turner and Nanette K. Turner. The Turners appeal. They contend the trial court erred in construing all matters in connection with a homeowners association’s application of architectural guidelines as matters to which section 425.16 applies. We agree. Not every mundane communication between a homeowners association and a homeowner gives rise to a freedom of speech issue. Section 425.16, subdivision (e)(4), at issue here, does not come into play unless the right of free speech or the right to petition is involved. The cause of action itself must be based on the speech or petitioning activity. If neither of those rights is at stake, section 425.16, subdivision (e)(4) is inapplicable, irrespective of whether the subject of the dispute may otherwise be a matter of public interest. We reverse.

I

FACTS

The Turners, as trustees of their living trust, own residential real property in Aliso Viejo, California. The real property is subject to conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&R’s) that require homeowners to obtain…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.