Hollie

People v. Hollie

Bad Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 3d 633·180 Cal. App. 4th 1262·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 6·10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 319
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2010A121545California5,839 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dondero, J.

Defendant was convicted following a jury trial of rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2)), and sexual penetration with a foreign object (Pen. Code, § 289, subd. (a)(1)), and sentenced to a term of 10 years in state prison. In this appeal he argues that the statute of limitations for the offenses lapsed before the prosecution was commenced. He also challenges evidentiary rulings by the trial court: the admission of evidence of the uncharged sex offense; the exclusion of defense impeachment evidence; and the admission of evidence of his involuntary statement made to the police. Finally, he claims that prosecutorial misconduct was committed. We conclude that the 10-year statute of limitations did not expire, the trial court’s evidentiary rulings were not erroneous, and no prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct was committed. We therefore affirm the judgment.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The Charged Offenses.

Athena, the victim of the charged sex offenses, testified that after drinking “about a six pack” on the evening of September 20, 1996, she had an argument with her husband and left their apartment- in Daly City. She was barefoot and carrying a kitten her husband had thrown out of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.