Duong

People v. Duong

Good Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 3d 678·180 Cal. App. 4th 1533·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 32
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 2010A124640California2,874 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

The district attorney of San Francisco appeals from an order fixing the amount of restitution that defendant Tuan Quong Duong is obligated to pay to the victim of his assault. The victim received medical treatment at Kaiser Hospital, a facility within the Kaiser California North Health Plan (Kaiser), of which the victim was a member. The trial court refused to require restitution of the amount “billed” for the victim’s treatment because as a member of Kaiser the victim was not liable to pay any additional amount for those services. Defendant has filed no opposing brief in this court. We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to include in the restitution order the amount that would be accepted as full payment for the medical services to the victim which, however, is less than the amount billed for those services demanded by the district attorney.

Background

Pursuant to a negotiated disposition, defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of Penal Code section 245, subdivision (a)(1), assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury upon two victims, one of whom was Sarah Ruggerio. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.