Franco

People v. Franco

Bad Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 3d 310·180 Cal. App. 4th 713·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 2050
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2009B211850California4,915 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant David Garcia Franco (defendant) was arrested after an inspection of his apartment revealed a large quantity of drugs and drug paraphernalia. Defendant admitted to using the drugs, but denied that he sold or intended to sell them. A jury convicted defendant of maintaining a place for selling, giving away or using a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11366). The jury acquitted defendant on two counts of possession of a controlled substance for sale (§§ 11351, 11378), but convicted defendant of the lesser included offense of simple possession of a controlled substance (§§ 11350, subd. (a), 11377, subd. (a)).

In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that section 11366 is not violated by a defendant’s personal use of a controlled substance in his or her own home, even if the defendant used drugs continuously or repeatedly. As relevant here, section 11366 is violated only if the defendant maintains a place for the continuous or repeated use of drugs by others. Accordingly, the trial court erred by giving the jury an instruction that permitted it to convict defendant for maintaining a place for his own personal drug use.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.