San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Deidre B.

Good Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 3d 825·180 Cal. App. 4th 1306·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 9
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 2010D054783California4,159 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Deidre B. appeals from a judgment reestablishing conservatorship of her person. She contends the trial court violated her due process rights by accepting a stipulation filed by her attorney stating she consented to the reestablishment and waived her right to a formal hearing. We reject this contention.

We also reject Deidre’s assertion that we should consider a postjudgment declaration in which Deidre raises new factual allegations challenging her knowing consent to the stipulated reestablishment. Although filed with the trial court after the judgment, this declaration was never presented to the trial court for a ruling. When a conservatee seeks to challenge his or her consent after entry of a stipulated judgment, these new factual allegations should be resolved at the trial court level through a petition for rehearing or a habeas corpus petition. Pursuit of appellate remedies without obtaining a ruling from the trial court merely prolongs the process without providing the conservatee the opportunity to seek timely relief.

We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

On October 21, 2008, the San Diego County Public Conservator filed a petition to reestablish…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.