In Re Anna S.

M. Elizabeth Handy, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minor.

BENKE, Acting P. J. —

Angelina S. appeals an order detaining her daughter Anna under Welfare and Institutions Code [1] section 388. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

The appellant parent appeals from a detention order that was made after this court filed an opinion reversing an order placing the child with the parent but before the remittitur issued. The parent contends the trial court improperly relied on the nonfinal opinion [2] to detain the child. At issue is whether a trial court may rely on a nonfinal appellate opinion to shape the outcome of ongoing dependency proceedings in the same case.

As we discuss, post, we are concerned about the use, in whole or in part, of a nonfinal opinion, based on a months-old record, to influence the outcome of a matter that should have been decided on evidence of the family's current circumstances and child's needs at the appropriately noticed hearing. Although the issues concerning the validity of the detention order have been rendered moot by the issuance of the remittitur in this court's earlier unpublished opinion ( In re Anna S. (Mar. 13, 2009, D053800) ( Anna S.…