Pham

People v. Pham

Good Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 3d 366·180 Cal. App. 4th 919·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 2084
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 28, 2009G040848California4,511 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bedsworth, J.

There appears to be no limit to the ability of our species to devise new and different bad things to do to each other. Here we deal with a criminal hybridization of fraud and molestation first addressed by legislation in 2002. The issues presented appear to be of first impression in California.

Chiropractor Chi Van Pham was convicted of sexual battery by fraud (Pen. Code, § 243.4, subd. (c)) for touching the intimate body parts of his patients while purporting to examine them. He contends there is insufficient evidence to support the convictions because he did not mislead the patients into believing the touching was for professional purposes. However, considering the totality of the circumstances surrounding the examinations, the jury could reasonably conclude the patients were unaware of the sexual nature of the touching due to Pham’s fraudulent representations. Therefore, we uphold his convictions and affirm the judgment.

FACTS

Count 3

In 2003, Julie, then 13 years old, was involved in a serious car accident which left her with pain in her hip, back and neck. As part of her treatment, she went to Pham’s office for chiropractic adjustments and physical therapy. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.