Sanchez

People v. Sanchez

Good Law
103 Cal. Rptr. 3d 334·180 Cal. App. 4th 763·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 2072
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 2009E048972California3,152 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ramirez, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS OPINION IS DEPUBLISHED UPON GRANTING OF PETITION FOR REVIEW. THE OPINION APPEARS BELOW WITH A GRAY BACKGROUND.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 765 OPINION A jury convicted defendant, Raul A. Sanchez, of the misdemeanor of indecent exposure (Pen. Code, § 314 , subd. 1). He was sentenced to local time and appealed to the appellate department of the trial court. The appellate department, in a per curiam opinion, reversed defendant's conviction because it concluded, although disagreeing with it, that it was bound under Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450 , 455 [ 20 Cal.Rptr. 321 , 369 P.2d 937 ], to follow an appellate court opinion which was not then final, and for which review before the California Supreme Court has since been granted. 1 The appellate department then certified the case for transfer to this court, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1002 and 8.1005, and we granted the transfer. Since then, the California Supreme Court deferred action in the case for which it granted review, pending the outcome of People…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.