Sharabianlou

Scheherezade Sharabianlou v. Karp

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 3d 300·181 Cal. App. 4th 1133·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 141
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 5, 2010A120940, A122167, A122548California6,861 words

Opinion

Opinion

Needham, J.

—These appeals have their origin in a failed real estate transaction. Appellants Farrokh and Scheherezade Sharabianlou offered to purchase a commercial building owned by respondent Berenstein Associates. The Sharabianlous engaged real estate agent Ronald Karp and his company California Realty Investment Company (hereafter the Karps) to represent them in the transaction. Soon after the offer was made, however, the parties learned of environmental contamination on the property. Faced with uncertainty about the scope of the contamination and the cost of its cleanup, and unable to agree on who should pay for the remediation, the parties failed to close escrow on the agreed-upon date.

After further efforts to resuscitate the transaction were unsuccessful, the Sharabianlous sued the Berensteins and the Karps, seeking, among other remedies, rescission of their agreement with the former and tort damages from the latter. The trial court ordered the contract rescinded on equitable grounds and, citing its statutory authority to adjust the equities under Civil Code section 1692, awarded substantial damages to the Berensteins. It later awarded attorney fees to the Berensteins as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.