Poniktera

Poniktera v. Seiler

Good Law
104 Cal. Rptr. 3d 291·181 Cal. App. 4th 121·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 57
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 2010D054267California8,903 words

Opinion

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

—In this action, Linda Poniktera alleged Deborah Seiler, acting in her official capacity as Registrar of Voters for the County of San Diego (Registrar), violated statutory and constitutional provisions by (1) having a written policy that improperly limited the ability of citizens to document election voting with cameras and other recording devices, and (2) not enacting or enforcing policies to secure election ballot boxes against tampering or to require poll workers to account for ballots. Poniktera’s action sought declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as a writ of mandate, to require Registrar (1) to allow citizens to use cameras or other recording devices inside polling stations in future elections, and (2) to comply with obligations to secure ballot boxes against tampering in future elections.

After a hearing at which the trial court made numerous evidentiary rulings adverse to Poniktera, the trial court denied the requested relief. On appeal, Poniktera asserts the trial court abused its discretion in its evidentiary rulings and by denying her request for a writ of mandate and for declaratory and injunctive relief.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.