Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan Beach

Good Law
105 Cal. Rptr. 3d 41·181 Cal. App. 4th 521·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 95·40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20030
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 27, 2010B215788California11,828 words

Opinion

Opinion

Defendant, the City of Manhattan Beach (the city), appeals from a judgment issuing a peremptory writ of mandate. The city had issued a negative declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act in connection with an ordinance. (Pub. Resources Code, [1] § 21000 et seq.) The ordinance prohibited certain retailers, including grocery stores, from providing plastic bags to customers at the point of sale. The trial court vacated the ordinance and disallowed reenactment pending an environmental impact report. The trial court found substantial evidence supported a fair argument the ordinance may cause increased use of paper bags, which may have a significant negative impact on the environment, therefore an environmental impact report was required. We agree. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. We do not resolve the question of the ultimate merits of whether the plastic bag distribution ban should be implemented. All we are saying is that an environmental impact report must be prepared given that it can be fairly argued based on substantial evidence in the record that the ordinance may have a significant environmental impact. We emphasize that the fair argument…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.