Harris

Harris v. City of Santa Monica

Good Law
106 Cal. Rptr. 3d 6·181 Cal. App. 4th 1094·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 135·108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 762
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 4, 2010B199571California4,964 words

Opinion

Opinion

RUBIN, Acting P. J.—

The City of Santa Monica appeals from the judgment in favor of discharged city bus driver Wynona Harris in her pregnancy discrimination lawsuit against the city. Because of instructional error, we reverse and remand for retrial.

Santa Monica's city-owned bus service, Big Blue Bus, hired Wynona Harris as a bus driver trainee in October 2004. Shortly into her 40-day training period, Harris had what she calls a minor accident, which the city deemed "preventable." No passengers were on her bus and no one was injured, but the accident cracked the glass on the bus's back door. When the city hired Harris, it gave her its "Guidelines for Job Performance Evaluation." The guidelines stated, "Preventable accidents ... [are] an indication of unsafe driving.... [T]hose who drive in an unsafe manner will not pass probation."

In mid-November 2004, Harris successfully completed her training period, and the city promoted her to the position of probationary part-time bus driver. (Her formal title was "Motor Coach Operator Part Time.") As a probationary driver, Harris was an at-will employee. Sometime during her first three-month probation evaluation period (the record is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.