Rios

Rios v. Pulido

Good Law
100 Cal. App. 4th 359·122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 501·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4412·2002 Daily Journal DAR 8064·2002 WL 1584585
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2002B150900California899 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Internal Revenue Code sections 151 and 152 allow an income tax dependency exemption for a parent who has custody of a child for the greater portion of the calendar year. Here we hold federal law does not preempt the family law court, in its discretion, from alternating the dependency exemption between the parents even though one parent may have custody during the calendar year for less than half the time.

Gloria Pulido appeals an order by the family law court declaring that Albert J. Rios is entitled to an income tax dependency exemption for his minor child for the tax year 1999 and for odd-numbered years thereafter. We remand the matter so that the family law court may modify its order to require execution of declarations waiving the exemption, but otherwise affirm.

Facts

On December 6, 1995, a son was born to Rios and Pulido. They shared physical custody of the child, although by court order, Pulido received greater custody time.

On December 21, 1998, the family law court ordered that neither party pay child support because “the guideline amount is rebutted by the present custodial arrangement.” The court order did not allocate the income tax dependency exemption to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.