Dowhal

Dowhal v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CONSUMER

Good Law
100 Cal. App. 4th 8·122 Cal. Rptr. 2d 246
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 23, 2002A094460California11,793 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Theodora Berger, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Craig Thompson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Edward G. Weil, Dennis Ragen, Susan S. Fiering, Deputy Attorneys General, Amicus Curiae on behalf of plaintiff and appellant.

James P. Bennett, Michelle B. Corash, Maria Chedid, Brooks M. Beard, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, San Francisco, Gene Livingston, Matthew J. Goldman, Livingston & Mattesich Law Corp, Sacramento, Paul D. Fogel, San Francisco, John E. Dittoe, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, for defendants and respondents.

Catherine Hanson, Astrid Meghrigian, California Medical Association, San Francisco, Daniel E. Troy, Chief Counsel, Lynn Whipkey Mehler, Associate Chief Counsel, Heidi P. Foster, Assistant Chief Counsel, Food and Drug Administration, Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, David W. Shapiro, United States Attorney, Douglass Letter, Peter R. Maier, Department of Justice, Amicus Curiae on behalf of defendants and respondents.

JONES, P.J.

Appellant filed an action challenging the failure of respondents to place health warnings mandated by California's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.