Neal

Neal v. Superior Court

Good Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 262·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 477·2001 Daily Journal DAR 6385·90 Cal. App. 4th 22·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5202
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2001G028185California1,555 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sills, J.

Herman and Judith Neal got divorced in 1996; the judgment required Herman to pay Judith $25,000—about $21,000 to equalize the division of community property plus another $4,000 for child support arrears. Herman was to pay $15,000 of the amount immediately, and give Judith a promissory note for the balance, secured by a trust deed encumbering Herman’s interest in the family residence. Additionally, Herman was ordered to pay about $2,500 a month as child support for the couple’s three minor children, and another $750 in spousal support for a limited duration.

Herman apparently never paid any of the roughly $10,000 he owed under the note. By March 1999, Judith, strapped for funds, sold the note to a collection agency for some $5,500. She also went to the district attorney to help her collect support arrearages which, she now alleges, exceeded $18,000.

Herman filed an order to show cause (OSC) to reduce his child support in September 1999; the OSC was heard on January 26, 2000, and resulted in this stipulation: Herman would pay Judith $11,500 as an accord and satisfaction. In return, Judith agreed to close her case with the district attorney and extinguish a wage assignment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.