Robert

Robert v. Superior Court

Good Law
109 Cal. Rptr. 2d 716·90 Cal. App. 4th 1414
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2001G027381California4,637 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tony Rackauckas, District Attorney and Brian N. Gurwitz, Deputy District Attorney, for Real Party in Interest.

BEDSWORTH, Acting P.J.

In this case, we interpret a recent amendment to the California Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act (Pen.Code, § 186.20 et seq.) that was accomplished by the passage of Proposition 21. Particularly, we endeavor to ascertain the nature and scope of newly-enacted Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (d). That provision describes criminal penalties for any person who is convicted of an offense punishable as a felony or a misdemeanor, which is committed for the benefit of, and with the specific intent to promote, a criminal street gang. Petitioner Robert L. contends the provision sets forth a penalty scheme that applies only to so-called wobbler offenses. Real party in interest, represented by the district attorney, maintains the provision constitutes a substantive offense that applies to both felonies and misdemeanors. The parties are both partly right a characterization each will doubtless apply to this opinion.

We hold the scope of the provision includes all gang-related offenses, not just wobblers. We also find the statute is more…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.