Ferrell

Ferrell v. County of San Diego

Good Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 681·2001 Cal. App. LEXIS 526·2001 Daily Journal DAR 7029·90 Cal. App. 4th 537·2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5757
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 2001D034864California2,195 words

Opinion

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

Dana K. Ferrell appeals a judgment awarding him damages in his inverse condemnation action against the County of San Diego (County). Ferrell contends the trial court erred by (1) excluding the testimony of his appraisal expert, and (2) not awarding him certain costs and attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1036. County filed a cross-appeal and contends the trial court erred by (1) denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV), (2) denying its alternative motion for a new trial, (3) awarding Ferrell an excessive amount of prejudgment interest, and (4) awarding Ferrell excessive costs and attorney fees under section 1036. Because there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s award of $189,078.33 in mitigation damages, we reverse the judgment to the extent it awarded those damages, and prejudgment interest on those damages, and remand with directions for the trial court to grant County’s JNOV motion, award Ferrell a total of $1,890.74 in damages, and redetermine the amounts of costs, fees and prejudgment interest awarded to Ferrell.

Factual and Procedural Background

In 1988 Ferrell bought two adjacent lots (Property) in Lakeside…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.