Royal Thrift & Loan Co. v. County Escrow, Inc.

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 4th 24·20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 37·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1728·2004 Daily Journal DAR 12668·4 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9276
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 15, 2004B165006California7,722 words

Opinion

Opinion

Curry, J.

In the underlying action, Arthur Paul Jones and Rosalie K. Jones filed a complaint against Michelle Kramer, County Escrow, Inc. (County Escrow), and Royal Thrift and Loan Company (Royal Thrift), among others, alleging negligence and fraud in connection with a loan secured by real property that they owned, and seeking quiet title. Royal Thrift cross-complained, seeking quiet title to the property, alleging, inter alia, negligence and fraud against Kramer and County Escrow, and requesting recovery on a bond issued by Star Insurance Company (Star Insurance) on behalf of Kramer and County Escrow. Kramer, County Escrow, and Star Insurance also cross-complained for indemnity.

The judgment following trial determined that Royal Thrift had the right to foreclose upon a deed of trust secured by the Joneses’ property, and reserved the trial court’s jurisdiction to assess Royal Thrift’s damages (if any), when it exercised this right. After Royal Thrift conducted the foreclosure sale, the trial court entered a modified judgment, awarding Royal Thrift damages against Kramer and County Escrow, and allowing it to recover from Star Insurance on its bond.

Kramer, County Escrow, and Star…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.