Burnett

Burnett v. Chimney Sweep, LLC

Bad Law
123 Cal. App. 4th 1057·20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 562·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1846·2004 Daily Journal DAR 13471·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9860
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20042d Civil No. B167190California4,470 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

George and Marie Burnett appeal from a judgment on the pleadings in favor of Chimney Sweep, LLC, and Courtland-Dane Management Group, Inc., respondents. They also appeal from postjudgment orders awarding attorney fees to respondents. The action arises from the growth of mold in premises leased by appellants from Chimney Sweep. Courtland-Dane is Chimney Sweep’s property manager.

Appellants contend: (1) respondents’ motions for judgment on the pleadings were untimely; (2) in ruling on the motions, the trial court erroneously considered extrinsic evidence; (3) judgment on the pleadings was erroneously granted; (4) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to grant leave to amend the complaint; (5) Courtland-Dane was not entitled to attorney fees because it was not a party to the lease; and (6) the attorney fees awarded were excessive. We reverse the order granting judgment on the pleadings. This moots the fourth, fifth and sixth contentions.

Procedural and Factual Background

Commencing September 1, 1998, Chimney Sweep leased to appellants a commercial space (hereafter the premises) consisting of approximately 470 square feet in a hotel in Solvang. Appellants were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.