Page

People v. Page

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 4th 1466·20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 857·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1888·2004 Daily Journal DAR 13751·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10112
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 2004E035010California3,090 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richli, J.

Defendant Larry Robert Page or his accomplice took money from the victim’s pockets; either before or afterwards, the accomplice held a sharp pencil up to the victim’s neck and warned him not to come back with the police. As a result, defendant was found guilty of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (c)) and assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)). He was given a suspended sentence of three years in prison, then placed on probation for five years, on conditions including a year in jail.

Defendant contends, among other things, there was insufficient evidence that the pencil was a deadly weapon or, alternatively, because there was substantial evidence that the pencil was not a deadly weapon, the trial court erred by failing to instruct on simple assault as a lesser included offense. In the published portion of this opinion, we will hold that the pencil was a deadly weapon as a matter of law, even though the accomplice did not actually wield it with deadly force and even though she used it solely in connection with a threat to harm the victim in the future.

In the unpublished portion of this opinion, we accept the People’s concession…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.