Sands

Handyman Connection of Sacramento, Inc. v. Sands

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 4th 867·20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 727·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1828·2004 Daily Journal DAR 13345·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9790
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2004C045644California10,624 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

In this case, we construe various provisions of the Contractors’ State License Law related to a contractor’s solicitation and obtaining of a contract to perform work in someone’s home.

In a disciplinary proceeding against plaintiff Handyman Connection of Sacramento, Inc. (Handyman) brought by the Contractors’ State License Board (the Board), an administrative law judge (ALJ) found that Handyman had committed four violations of the Contractors’ State License Law. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 7000 et seq. (the License Law).) The Board adopted the ALJ’s proposed decision and imposed a penalty of $350.

Handyman filed a petition for peremptory writ of administrative mandamus against defendant Steven P. Sands, Registrar of Contractors, in Sacramento County Superior Court, seeking to vacate the Board’s decision. The trial court denied the petition. Handyman appeals from the ensuing judgment. We shall reverse one of four grounds of discipline found by the Board and otherwise affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The citation

On January 26, 2001, the Registrar of Contractors issued a citation to Handyman in regard to its project installing hardwood flooring at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.