Boysen

People v. Boysen

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 4th 1409·62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 350
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 3, 2007D046763California7,713 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS OPINION IS DEPUBLISHED UPON GRANTING OF PETITION FOR REVIEW. THE OPINION APPEARS BELOW WITH A GRAY BACKGROUND.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1411 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1412 OPINION In 1980 Elsie Boysen (Elsie) and her husband Robert Boysen (Robert) were murdered. In May 2004 their son, defendant David Andrew Boysen (David), was charged with the crimes. David sought and the trial court granted dismissal based on preaccusation delay. The People appeal, arguing the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard. They further contend that in any event there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court's decision, and the court abused its discretion in not reserving a decision on the motion until after trial. We affirm. We conclude the trial court applied the correct legal standard which required it balance the actual prejudice to David against the prosecution's justification for the delay. We further conclude there was substantial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.