Limited Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 4th 1491·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1129·62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 191
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 2007A102915California4,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

Simons, J.

This matter has been remanded by the Supreme Court (SI36922) with directions to vacate our previous decision (The Limited Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board (July 28, 2005, A102915) [nonpub. opn.]) and reconsider the cause in light of Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 750 [ 47 Cal.Rptr.3d 216 , 139 P.3d 1169 ] (Microsoft) and General Motors Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd. (2006) 39 Cal.4th 773 [ 47 Cal.Rptr.3d 233 , 139 P.3d 1183 ]. In our earlier decision we affirmed a summary judgment granted in favor of the Franchise Tax Board (FTB). We concluded that the full price of securities held to maturity and redeemed were not properly treated as gross receipts by the taxpayer under the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act (UDITPA) (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 25120 et seq.). Microsoft, however, reached a contrary result. We vacate our previous decision, and affirm the judgment of the trial court, albeit on a different ground.

Background

Plaintiffs, The Limited Stores, Inc., and 24 of its affiliated corporations (hereafter collectively The Limited), compose a unitary business that retails within and without California and so is subject to California taxes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.