Selten

Junho Hyon v. Selten

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 4th 463·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1022·60 Cal. Rptr. 3d 896
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 22, 2007B188665California4,102 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rothschild, J.

Eric Selten appeals from the summary judgment entered against him on his cross-complaint against Junho Hyon. The trial court granted summary judgment on the ground that all of Selten’s claims were based upon a contract that was illegal in part, and that the illegal portions of the contract could not be severed. We agree that the contract was illegal in part and that the illegal portions cannot be severed, but we conclude that Selten should nonetheless be permitted to pursue his common count for the reasonable value of any lawful services rendered. We therefore reverse in part.

BACKGROUND

This appeal concerns a fee dispute arising out of litigation commenced in 1993 regarding the rights of Hyon and his business associate, Laurence Colangelo, in a sand mining operation on Decker Island in the Sacramento River. The trial court originally dismissed Hyon and Colangelo’s suit, but the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment of dismissal in 1996. Unhappy with their trial counsel, Hyon and Colangelo began looking for a replacement.

In 1997, Hyon and Colangelo entered into a contract with National Legal Network (NLN), of which Selten was then president. The express purpose of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.