Davis

Davis v. LAUSD PERSONNEL COM'N

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 4th 1122·62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 69
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 28, 2007B188435California6,977 words

Opinion

Opinion

MALLANO, Acting P.J.

In 2001, plaintiff was demoted from his position of employment with the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). Before learning of the demotion, plaintiff commenced a disability leave for reasons unrelated to his employment. Due to his illness, plaintiff has remained unavailable for work ever since.

In 2003, the Personnel Commission of the LAUSD (Commission) found that the demotion was wrongful and ordered the LAUSD to reinstate plaintiff to his prior position, effective as of the date of the demotion. The Commission also concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to full back pay in light of his unavailability for work.

The primary question on appeal is whether an employee who is wrongfully demoted is entitled to full back pay for a period when he was not available for work due to a nonindustrial illness. We conclude that, because back pay is a makewhole remedy, intended to restore the employee to the financial situation that would have existed but for the employer's wrongful conduct, an employee is not entitled to earnings he or she would not have received in any event. We also conclude that the employee in this case was not entitled to immediate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.