Community Development Commission v. County of Ventura

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 4th 1470·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1125·62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 383
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 5, 2007F050180California6,298 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cornell, J.

We must decide whether escape assessments, an assessment that is made because the property in question was not assessed during the initial assessment period, should be included in computing the tax increment used to determine the funding for redevelopment agencies. This is an issue of first impression.

The Community Redevelopment Law (CRL) (Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.) provides for the formation of redevelopment agencies to help eradicate blight. Typically, a redevelopment agency prepares a redevelopment plan and then borrows money to complete the plan. A redevelopment agency repays its debt using tax increment. Tax increment is based on the theory that property values will increase as a redevelopment occurs. The increase in property values will cause an increase in tax revenue. The tax increment is the tax revenue attributable to the increased property values.

Defendants County of Ventura and Christine L. Cohen (collectively, the County) argue that escape assessments should not be included in computing the tax increment. Plaintiff Community Development Commission of the City of Oxnard (CDC) and amicus curiae California State University Channel Islands Site…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.