Salazar

Salazar v. Interland, Inc.

Good Law
152 Cal. App. 4th 1031·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1047·62 Cal. Rptr. 3d 24
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 26, 2007B189889California3,366 words

Opinion

Opinion

Todd, J.

We affirm summary judgment in favor of respondents on appellant Vincent Salazar’s claim for commissions on the transfer of Internet and Web-hosting services to respondents from AT&T Corp. The trial court correctly found that the transaction was the sale of a business opportunity and that under Business and Professions Code section 10131, subdivision (a), Salazar was required to be licensed as a broker in order to recover compensation for arranging the sale or acquisition of this business.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Complaint

Salazar, individually and doing business as Los Angeles Technology, sued respondents HostPro, Inc. (HostPro), and Interland, Inc. (Interland), for breach of contract and fraud. He alleged that he was an agent of AT&T Corp. (AT&T) authorized to market Internet and Web-hosting services to small and medium-sized businesses (the Web services). In 2001, he advised HostPro, which also provided Web services to small and medium businesses, that AT&T no longer wished to provide these Web services. HostPro expressed an interest in acquiring AT&T’s small and medium business clients.

On February 13, 2001, Salazar entered into a written contract…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.