Go

Go v. Pacific Health Services, Inc.

Bad Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 3d 736·179 Cal. App. 4th 522
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 19, 2009B211054, B212255California3,880 words

Opinion

Opinion

Willhite, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Vilma Go filed a complaint seeking the involuntary dissolution of Pacific Health Services, Inc. (PHS), in which she had been a director and shareholder, pursuant to Corporations Code section 1800, naming as defendants PHS, and David Sylvia and Paul Husen, the other directors and shareholders of PHS (sometimes collectively referred to herein as defendants). Defendants sought to avoid dissolution of PHS by purchasing Go’s shares under section 2000 which, once invoked, requires the trial court to appoint three disinterested appraisers to assist the court in determining the valuation of the corporation at issue. After considering the reports of the appraisers, in accordance with the requirements of section 2000, the trial court stayed the dissolution proceeding and fixed the fair value of Go’s shares, and thereafter entered a decree providing in the alternative for the winding up and dissolution of the corporation unless defendants made payment to Go for her shares, in the specified amount, within the time specified by the decree.

Go appeals from the decree, contending that the court’s valuation of PHS was erroneous and undervalued her shares.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.