Fulton

People v. Fulton

Bad Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 3d 229·179 Cal. App. 4th 1230·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1926
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 2, 2009C058389California3,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

A jury convicted defendant David Louis Fulton of evading an officer with willful or wanton disregard (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a); count I) and driving on a suspended license, a misdemeanor (Veh. Code, § 14601.1, subd. (a); count II). In bifurcated proceedings, defendant waived his right to a jury determination and entered a negotiated admission to a prior prison term allegation (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)) in exchange for dismissal of the remaining allegations.

After denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his admission to the prior prison term allegation, the trial court sentenced defendant to state prison for an aggregate term of four years.

Defendant appeals. With respect to his admission of the prior prison term, defendant filed a request but did not obtain a certificate of probable cause (Pen. Code, § 1237.5; CPC). He contends (1) insufficient evidence supports his conviction for evading in that there was no evidence that an illuminated red lamp was visible from the front of the officer’s vehicle, (2) the trial court failed to instruct the jury on one of two theories of guilt for evading and it cannot be determined which theory the jury relied upon in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.