Paland

Paland v. Brooktrails Township Community Services District Board of Directors

Good Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 3d 270·179 Cal. App. 4th 1358·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1940
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2009A122630California5,241 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bruiniers, J.

This appeal requires us to construe certain provisions in the taxpayer initiative Proposition 218 (Cal. Const., arts. XIII C, XIII D) distinguishing between what may properly be classified as a property-related water or sewer fee, exempt from a requirement for ballot approval by a majority of affected property owners, and an assessment for which such a vote is mandated. We conclude that a minimum charge imposed on parcels with connections to a water district’s utility systems for the basic cost of providing water or sewer service, regardless of actual use, is a charge for an immediately available property-related water or sewer service as defined in article XIII D, section 6, subdivision (b)(4), and consequently does not require ballot approval by affected owners. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment for the water district.

Background

The Brooktrails Township Community Services District (District) was formed to provide water and sewer service to about 6,500 real property parcels in or near Willits, California. (Gov. Code, § 61000 et seq.) About 1,536 of the parcels are currently connected to the District’s water system, and about 1,490 are connected to its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.