Yarbray

Jackson v. Yarbray

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 3d 303·179 Cal. App. 4th 75·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1806
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 2009B204321California9,359 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perluss, J.

Following a bifurcated bench trial the court found ComputerXpress.com, Inc. (ComputerXpress), Robert T. Yarbray, Wayne Nichols, Franklin Scivally and James L. Rather liable for the malicious prosecution of a civil action in Riverside County and awarded $700,000 in general damages for emotional distress and $2.41 million dollars in punitive damages in favor of Lee Jackson, Barbara Jackson, John Fecteau, Carol Fecteau and Thomas Mitchell, individually, and Thomas Mitchell, as the personal representative of the Estate of Doran Mitchell (collectively Jackson parties). The Jackson parties appeal, contending the trial court erred in concluding they failed to prove Best Best & Krieger LLP (BB&K), counsel for ComputerXpress for part of the time the Riverside action was pending, had acted with malice and, therefore, was not liable for malicious prosecution. They also contend the court erred in denying any recovery as special damages for attorney fees and expenses incurred in defending the Riverside action because those fees were recoverable in connection with the Jackson parties’ partially successful special motion to strike the complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.