Barboza

Barboza v. West Coast Digital GSM, Inc.

Good Law
102 Cal. Rptr. 3d 295·179 Cal. App. 4th 540·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1857
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 19, 2009B215454California2,527 words

Opinion

Opinion

Willhite, J.

What are the obligations of class counsel when he learns that the defendant in the class action he is prosecuting has ceased operations, sold its assets to a third party, and intends to file for bankruptcy? In the case before us, counsel obtained a stipulated default and a default judgment that included more than $4 million in aggregate damages for the class, plus more than $1 million in prejudgment interest. So far, so good. But counsel then asserted that his job would be completed once his motion for attorney fees was heard, i.e., that he had no obligation to enforce the judgment on behalf of the class. The trial court disagreed. It ruled that “by assuming the responsibility of pursuing claims on behalf of the class, class counsel assumed the obligation to pursue it until the end (i.e., enforcement of the judgment) and not just until judgment.” Based upon the principles guiding class actions, we agree that class counsel’s obligations to the class do not end with the entry of judgment, and hold that class counsel’s obligations continue until all class issues are resolved, which may include enforcement of the judgment.

BACKGROUND

This case is before us for the third…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.