Schroeder

Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Schroeder

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 3d 854·179 Cal. App. 4th 834·2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1894
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 2009F056339California6,225 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kane, J.

On learning that plaintiff Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (Fidelity) was about to file an abstract of judgment as a lien against his real property, defendant Gordon Schroeder (Gordon) deeded his interest in a Fresno home that he co-owned with defendant Toni Richardson, also known as Toni Schroeder (Toni), over to Toni. The trial court found that Gordon intended to defraud Fidelity, but the transfer was not set aside under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA; Civ. Code, § 3439 et seq.) because no recoverable value remained in the real property after deducting existing encumbrances and Gordon’s homestead exemption. The trial court also rejected Fidelity’s other causes of action, including that of resulting trust. Fidelity appeals, contending the trial court failed to correctly apply the law when it denied relief under the UFTA and the resulting trust cause of action. We agree with the trial court that Fidelity was not entitled to relief under the UFTA, but disagree with its conclusion that Fidelity could not maintain a resulting trust cause of action. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to determine, under the facts and circumstances of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.