In Re RS

Good Law
101 Cal. Rptr. 3d 910·179 Cal. App. 4th 1137
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 30, 2009A124021California1,556 words

Opinion

Opinion

Donna L. Hall and Valerie E. Sopher, under appointments by the Court of Appeal, for Objectors and Appellants.

Dohn R. Henion, County Counsel, and Ian W. Trueblood, Deputy County Counsel, for Petitioner and Respondent.

Janet G. Sherwood, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for the Minor.

MARCHIANO, P. J.—

The parents of the minor R.S. executed a relinquishment of parental rights with the State Department of Social Services (State Adoptions) in conformance with Family Code section 8700. Subsequently, the Juvenile Court of Del Norte County terminated their parental rights. M.T. (Mother) and R.S. (Father) appeal from that order, made pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. [1] We consider first Father's contention—in which counsel for the minor has joined—that the juvenile court erred in holding the section 366.26 hearing and in issuing orders that terminated parental rights and granted a request by the minor's foster parents (Foster Parents) to be designated as prospective adoptive parents pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (n). Father argues that in doing so the court impermissibly interfered with a final, voluntary relinquishment the parents had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.