Gomez

People v. Gomez

Caution
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 48·2 Cal. App. 4th 819·3 Cal. Rptr. 2d 418·92 Daily Journal DAR 659·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 505
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 1992B057019California2,827 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danielson, J.

Daniel Gomez (defendant) appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by jury of criminal offenses.

We reverse the judgment with regard to his convictions of false imprisonment for purposes of protection from arrest (Pen. Code, § 210.5) and grand theft vehicle (§ 487h, subd. (a)). We remand the matter with directions to dismiss those charges, to stay imposition of sentence as to the conviction of robbery (§ 211) and to credit defendant with one additional day of custody. The judgment of conviction of kidnapping for robbery (§ 209, subd. (b)) is affirmed.

The principal significance of this decision is its definition of the parameters of section 210.5, which was enacted in 1987, effective January 1, 1988.

Factual Statement

At about 2:45 a.m., on April 7, 1990, Jeanine Anderson (Anderson), a cocktail waitress at a night club in Torrance, driving home from work, pulled into a 7-Eleven store. As she got out of her car, defendant and a Mexican woman approached and asked for a ride. Anderson, who had never seen defendant before, said “no” and tried to lock the car. Defendant put his hands over her mouth and shoved her back into the car. He threatened to “stick”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.