Andre

Andre v. Superior Court

Good Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1468·2 Cal. App. 4th 11·2 Cal. Rptr. 2d 815·91 Daily Journal DAR 15959·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 1991E008853California2,877 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dabney, J.

Following an unsuccessful settlement conference, the trial court transferred this action from the superior court to the municipal court under the authority of Code of Civil Procedure section 396. The basis for the order was the trial court’s finding that plaintiff was “unlikely” to recover damages in excess of $25,000, and that the matter was therefore within the exclusive jurisdiction of the municipal court. (§ 86.)

Plaintiff filed a petition for writ of mandate with this court, which we summarily denied. The Supreme Court granted review, and subsequently transferred the matter back to this court with directions to issue an alternative writ of mandate, and to consider the effect of Walker v. Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 257 [ 279 Cal.Rptr. 576 , 807 P.2d 418 ]. We complied with this directive, and partially grant the relief requested by remanding the matter to the superior court for further proceedings.

Facts of the Case

The operative third amended complaint filed by plaintiffs Tony Andre and Lena Andre is entitled “Complaint for Tortious Breach of Insurance Contract,” and seeks both compensatory and punitive damages. It alleged that defendants had procured or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.