Richmond

People v. Richmond

Bad Law
1991 Cal. App. LEXIS 1504·2 Cal. App. 4th 610·3 Cal. Rptr. 2d 252·92 Daily Journal DAR 589·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 441
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 1991B057698California2,926 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

This is an appeal by the People from an order granting defendant Keith Richmond’s motion for a new trial on the grounds of instructional error (Pen. Code, § 1238, subd. (a)(3)). The People contend that the trial court erroneously concluded that it should have instmcted the jury on assault with a deadly weapon as a lesser included offense of attempted murder with the use of a deadly weapon and that the granting of a new trial was, therefore, an abuse of discretion. Defendant concedes that assault with a deadly weapon is not a lesser included offense of attempted murder but argues that the order granting him a new trial should nevertheless be upheld because the court should have instmcted the jury on assault with a deadly weapon as a lesser related offense of attempted murder. We reverse the order for new trial.

In an information, defendant was charged with attempted willful, deliberate and premeditated murder (Pen. Code, §§ 664 & 187). It was further alleged that defendant personally used a deadly weapon, namely a hatchet, during the attempt (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (b)) and that he intentionally inflicted great bodily injury on the victim (Pen. Code, § 12022.7). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.