Fitzpatrick

People v. Fitzpatrick

Bad Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 71·2 Cal. App. 4th 1285·3 Cal. Rptr. 2d 808·92 Daily Journal DAR 961·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 601
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 21, 1992E008501California4,283 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dabney, J.

A jury convicted defendant Duane Keith Fitzpatrick of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187) and found that he was armed with and personally used a firearm (§§ 12022, subd. (a), 12022.5). On appeal (People v. Fitzpatrick (Mar. 13, 1989) E004739, [nonpub. opn.]), this court reversed the judgment on the ground that erroneous jury instructions on implied malice had been given. The matter was remanded for retrial.

On retrial, a jury again convicted Fitzpatrick of first degree murder and found the armed and use allegations to be true. The court sentenced him to a two-year determinate term for the use of a firearm, a consecutive indeterminate term of twenty-five years to life for the murder, and stayed a one-year term for the armed allegation.

On appeal, Fitzpatrick contends the trial court erred in: (1) instructing the jury on the theory of murder by lying in wait; (2) instructing the jury with CALJIC No. 8.73 instead of Fitzpatrick’s requested modified instruction; (3) improperly instructing the jury on the order in which it should consider charges during deliberations; (4) giving an improper pinpoint instruction; and (5) refusing to allow Fitzpatrick to raise issues in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.